radical-beta:

when someone you don’t like loves the same song as you

image

marriagehoney:

lorenzay:

if you ship the Doctor and River, there’s a 90% chance I don’t care about anything you have to say to me about Doctor Who

If you judge anyone based on what they ship and only think a certain part of the fandom deserve to express their opinion about a tv-show, there’s a 100% chance I don’t care about anything you have to say at all 

kyubiisaan:

lowwbloods:

officialwillowpape:

i searched up ‘hurdlers without hurdles’ on google and i dont regret it

these boots are made for walkin

The ol razzle dazzle

kyubiisaan:

lowwbloods:

officialwillowpape:

i searched up ‘hurdlers without hurdles’ on google and i dont regret it

these boots are made for walkin

The ol razzle dazzle

bumbleshark:

well-written novel sized fanfiction

image

memebuscemi:

memebuscemi:

apparantly soulja boy made a song about kony amazing

image

arthur: i must go alone. completely alone. it is my duty to fulfill this quest in absolute solitude.
uther:
gwen:
gaius:
leon:
lancelot:
gwaine:
percival:
elyan:
arthur: ready when you are, merlin.

andromeda-tambourine:

bloodysnowwhite:

charlieinatrenchcoat:

this is why people are afraid of us

Hahaha the last one is hilarious XD

Why does everything the SPN fandom touches turn to gold?

raikagay:

remember like 2 years ago when christmas stopped feeling like christmas for some reason

Anonymous: Idk man, sometimes cockles feels "played up for the audience" or just a con persona.. Cuz I see them in other videos when they're just interacting with people and it doesn't seem as tender man. :(

mistofstars:

that-fucking-flamingo-shirt:

NOOOOOO SUPNON, DON’T BE SAD!!!! I’M HERE FOR YA!!

And I don’t think that’s true! I mean, this was a completely spur of the moment thing, Misha interrupted their interviews, and LOOK AT THEM!!!

image

AND THE TINY ADORABLE SHRUG I MEAN????????

image

 I am forever in love with that shrug <3 <3

And I’m pretty sure they didn’t know they were being filmed during this

image

image

image

image

And let’s not forget those precious moments Jensen knows he’s being filmed but forgets he’s being filmed

image

image

image

I mean, they are good actors

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

But they’re not THAT good.

my favorite thing in the world is seeing those dorks laughing together or laughing because the other is laughing. They’re so fucking sweet… T_T 

doctor who + text posts night vale tweets | part 2/? (rtd edition)

bonus:

Reblog If You Haver Ever Used One of These Or Just Know What It Is

carry-on-wayward-fallen-angel:

ashashi-corner:

ginathethundergoddess:

yugichrist:

xeppeli:

leader-of-standing-purgatorians:

reblogthings:

image

It’s scares me that only 16,000 people know what this is

wtf is this some kind of choclat bar

This object has killed over 400,000 people

oh my god. 

Guys.

We’re old.

WE’RE THE OLD ONES NOW

*PANICS*

image

Anonymous: can i just say u are very very cute ok bye

Omg ily thank youu *squee*

This is why you shouldn't click on the naked photos of Jennifer Lawrence

fabulouslyfreespirited:

If you deliberately seek out any of these images, you are directly participating in the violation not just of numerous women’s privacy but also of their bodies.
In what’s being called the biggest celebrity hacking incident in internet history, more than 100 female celebrities have had their private nude images stolen and published online. The bulk of the images posted have been officially confirmed as belonging to Jennifer Lawrence, but a complete list of victims’ names - including Krysten Ritter, Kate Upton, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Rihanna, Brie Larson and Kirsten Dunst - has been subsequently published. (Link does not contain pictures, only names.)
The images were first uploaded by an anonymous member of the underground internet sewer known as 4chan and have since been enthusiastically shared across platforms like Reddit and Twitter. A representative for Lawrence has confirmed the images are real, condemning the theft of them as a “flagrant violation of privacy” and adding that “The authorities have been contacted and will prosecute anyone who posts the stolen photos.”
There are a few different issues that a criminal act like this brings up, but before I get into them it’s necessary to make one thing clear: If you deliberately seek out any of these images, you are directly participating in the violation not just of numerous women’s privacy but also of their bodies. These images - which I have not seen and which I will not look for - are intimate, private moments belonging only to the people who appear in them and who they have invited to see them. To have those moments stolen and broadcast to the world is an egregious act of psychic violence which constitutes a form of assault.
The people sharing these images are perpetuating an ongoing assault. The people gleefully looking at them are witnessing and enjoying an ongoing assault. When you have been asked by victims of a crime like this not to exacerbate the pain of that crime and you continue to do so anyway, you are consciously deciding that your enjoyment, your rights and perhaps even just your curiosity are more important than the safety and dignity of the people you’re exploiting.
That out of the way, let’s get a few other things straight.
1. This is not a ‘scandal’
It’s a crime, and we should be discussing it as such. Some media outlets are salaciously reporting it otherwise, as if the illegal violation of privacy involving intimate images is little more than subject for gossip. When associated with sex, the word ‘scandal’ has been typically interpreted as something that assigns responsibility to all parties involved, a consensual act unfortunately discovered and for which everyone owes an explanation or apology. Remember when private nude photos of Vanessa Hudgens (whose name also appears on the list of victims) were leaked online and Disney forced her to publicly apologise for her “lapse in judgment” and hoped she had “learned a valuable lesson”? Never mind that Hudgens was an adult and a victim of privacy violation - the ‘scandal’ was painted as something for which she owed her fans an apology. Which leads us to:
2. These women do not ‘only have themselves to blame’
While depressing, it’s sadly unsurprising to see some people arguing that Lawrence et al brought this on themselves. Part of living in a rape culture is the ongoing expectation that women are responsible for protecting themselves from abuse, and that means avoiding behaviour which might be later ‘exploited’ by the people who are conveniently never held to account for their actions. But women are entitled to consensually engage in their sexuality any way they see fit. If that involves taking nude self portraits for the enjoyment of themselves or consciously selected others, that’s their prerogative.
Victims of crime do not have an obligation to accept dual responsibility for that crime. Women who take nude photographs of themselves are not committing a criminal act, and they shouldn’t ‘expect’ to become victims to one, as actress Mary E. Winstead pointed out on Twitter. 
Sending a photograph of your breasts to one person isn’t consenting to having the whole world see those breasts, just as consenting to sex with one person isn’t the same as giving permission for everyone else to fu*k you. Victim blaming isn’t okay, even if it does give you a private thrill to humiliate the female victims of sexual exploitation.
3. It doesn’t matter that ‘damn, she looks good and should own it!’
Stealing and sharing the private photographs of women doesn’t become less of a crime just because you approve them for fapping activity. I’m sure many of the women on this list are confident of their sexual attractiveness. It doesn’t mean they don’t value their privacy or shouldn’t expect to enjoy the same rights to it as everyone else. It also doesn’t mean they want strangers sweating over their images. That line of thinking comes from the same school which instructs women to either ignore of welcome sexual harassment when it’s seemingly ‘positive’ in its sentiments.
None of these women are likely to give a shit that you think their bodies are ‘tight, damn’. Despite what society reinforces to us about the public ownership of women’s bodies, we are not entitled to co-opt and objectify them just because we think we can defend it as a compliment.
I will not be seeking out these images out and I urge everyone else to avoid doing the same. I hope that all the women who have been victimised here are being appropriately supported by the authorities and their network of friends. And I hope sincerely that more people take a stand against this kind of behaviour.
Because this incident aside, it strikes me as deeply ironic that we will vehemently protest a free Facebook messenger app because we’re outraged at reports that it can access our phone’s numbers, and yet turn around and excuse the serving up of women’s bodies for our own pleasure. Our appreciation is no less disgusting just because it’s accompanied by the sound of one hand clapping.